And as I’ve pointed out repeatedly, it doesn’t matter how much you claim to despise Trump when you’re drawing on all of the defences of his most ardent supporters. It’s a tactic of many of his followers online is to sow confusion and cast doubt by pretending to hate him while surreptitiously defending him. How do I know you’re not one of these keyboard warriors?

Your claim to be a champion for truth rings very hollow when you fail to address the other issues I’ve raised. The author wants Trump to be held accoutable. The term murder is irrelevant unless you want to divert the debate into a meaningless discussion of semantics and legal definitions (which seems to be your goal since your claims he knew nothing have fallen flat).

I’ll ask again, do you think Trump should be held accountable for his actions?