I'm confused. Wasn't it you who said it's easy to get casual sex?

And here we are back at the same point, with you arguing that men’s ‘needs’ should give them carte blanche to make unwanted and inappropriate sexual advances to whomever they like, regardless of the circumstances and power dynamics involved.

You understand the author’s anxiety and claim it’s not irrational, and that even you get anxious when a strange man comes to the door (one who doesn’t have all your personal info and the keys to your home), but that his ‘need for sex’ overrides her right to feel safe and secure in her home because ….. men have needs and shouldn’t be victimised for these needs. And he’s the real victim here anyway because of her nasty article. He’s also the hero for putting himself out there and facing rejection. And getting sex with a consenting partner who isn’t your tenant is a big hassle because bitches dangle their raw meat vaginas in men’s faces then refuse to put out after men have gone to all the trouble of being nice to them. But you’re all for women’s agency.

Oh, and unlike hers, his privacy and security are of utmost importance so he can’t use a sugar daddy website to find someone who wants this type of arrangement.

Got it.